Thursday, January 31, 2013

Week #1 - Update: Clinton Analysis (Samakosky Draft)




Hello Sophomores!

Here is one more resource to help ensure success for your analysis and FIRST GRADE of the new semester.  This is a draft....which means that there is so much more I could do or fix.  Please note how I present the argument and then continue to support it with CD and most importantly MY COMMENTARY.  I would add more commentary for this draft for sure!  

Good luck.  Put in the time and effort.  This is due at the door tomorrow. 

***Also - a quick reminder for your first Figment Friday.  Make sure you have your creative piece (typed) with copies for your group members (at least 5).  Bring some questions with you?  What are hoping to improve?

Take Care,

Samakosky

Prep Advice:  Use the 4 questions given (page 10 in your NB) to guide you.  Use the format we learned to help you organize your thoughts – TS, CD, CM.  Remember that your commentary – what you think – your interpretation – is most meaningful.  Choose worthwhile concrete details to focus on.  Include how Clinton’s choice of language/diction assists in his argument.

TS – In his speech….., Clinton argues that there is a “great crisis of the spirit” that is gripping African American inner city communities in the United States.  Clinton passionately addresses the predominately Af/Am, southern, and religious congregation with a purposeful and methodical call to action; that the will to curb any issues concerning crime, violence, drug use, and employment must first begin from within.  Clinton implores for deep reflection and soul searching regarding matters of family values, morals, and a connection to our roots as the truest solutions to solving such crisis.

CD – In paragraph 20 and 21, Clinton rhetorically asks the congregation to imagine how MLK would react to the current status of the nation.  (Include text) He then enthusiastically repeats all the positive accomplishments – equality, etc, etc… However, Clinton quickly counterclaims with examples of crime and violence, essentially a “misuse” of the freedoms that MLK lived and died for. (Insert an Example here) Clintons logical and heartfelt approach and appeals – give way to his own credibility. 

CM – Answer why his logical/heartfelt approach/appeals and first person perspective is not only creative and purposeful – but also how this ties to the argument – dreams/freedoms of MLK misued.


TS - He cites several emotional anecdotes in paragraphs 23-29.  His inclusion of an endearing plea,  “it is our moral duty to turn it (this crisis) around” – incites an inclusive personal call to action to every person in attendance.  

CD -  Clinton states, “sometimes all the answers have to come from the values and the stirrings and the voices that speak within us”. This is directly related to the initial argument that reflection and inner change must happen for outside growth to occur.(More CM needed)

CM – Clinton uses rich biblical imagery and specific religious diction to connect to his devout audience.  He connects the history of the venue and the legacy of Martin Luther King to call to action for us to “reach inside to the values, the spirit, the soul, and the truth of human nature” so that “we will honor the life and work of MLK, and the church”.


Conclusion – Clinton states that all the hard work and reform that governments do is meaningless if the true work does not come from within the individuals that make up a community. His logical approach and ability to connect with emotional (pathos) and relatable anecdotes allows for a captivated audience – who understands and realizes such crisis can only be solved through willingness, faith, and a recharge of the human soul.

No comments:

Post a Comment